Poland Springs Lawsuit – A Class Action Suit Against Nestle Waters
The Poland Springs lawsuit is a class-action suit that seeks damages and compensation from Nestle Waters for misleading advertising and marketing of its water. In a 2003 case, plaintiffs claimed that the company was using water from a national forest in Maine when it was not. Today, the brand has expanded throughout the state and is seeking approval to use a public water district well in Lincoln, Maine, that once served a paper mill.
The lawsuit filed against Nestle alleges that Poland Spring in Maine has been dry for almost 50 years.
To qualify as a natural spring, water must flow naturally from an underground formation, such as a natural spring. The company collects water from these sites by drilling boreholes or filling bottles with water. The water must be able to flow naturally through a natural orifice. Whether the springs exist or not, the company is responsible for the water shortage.
The company also filed suit in the US District Court for failing to comply with FDA regulations for the use of Poland Springwater. While the water is made from springs, it does not meet FDA definitions of spring water. According to the FDA, a spring falls into this category only if it comes from underground and flows naturally to the surface of the earth. Moreover, the company claims that its products are contaminated with heavy metals.
Nestle SA, the company that owns Poland Spring, has denied the accusations.
The company claims to use spring water, but the source is groundwater. In other words, it does not meet FDA requirements for spring water. And it also doesn’t meet state standards for natural spring water. That means that Poland Spring is not a true “spring” at all, and consumers must be careful to buy it. The brand’s claims of pure water have cost the consumer a lot of money.
Despite the allegations, Poland Spring is still a popular brand in the United States. It sells more than one billion gallons of its water each year and does not meet FDA standards. To qualify as a “spring,” the water has to be naturally flowing and be found in an underground formation. No artificial springs have been discovered at the eight locations in Maine. Unlike other brands, Poland Spring is not a real spring. It is not a true spring and is not labeled as such.
In addition to claiming that the water in Poland Spring is natural, the company is not denying its existence.
The company’s marketing claims are “meritless” and the company’s water does meet the FDA’s standards. Aside from the legal claims, the company’s sales data does not show the actual sources of the Poland Springwater. Moreover, there is no photographic evidence of the springs. As a result, the brand’s popularity has grown dramatically in the last decade.
Nestle has admitted to faking the source of its water to make it appear to be a true spring. But the water in Poland Spring is not natural. Unlike other springs, it does not meet FDA standards for being a spring. Moreover, it does not conform to the definition of a spring, which is a requirement by the Food and Drug Administration. Consequently, the product is not truly spring.
Aside from faking the source of the water, Poland Spring also fails to comply with the FDA’s definition of a spring.
The definition of a true spring requires that the water flows through an underground formation. A borehole is not a natural orifice, but a spring requires a natural force to flow through it. The company’s fake springs do not comply with the FDA’s standards.
The Poland Spring lawsuit makes a series of bizarre allegations that are hard to believe. The company says the water in its water is from a natural spring that dried up almost 50 years ago. In the meantime, the company claims it has built six artificial springs to comply with FDA regulations and sell its products. It is not uncommon for a company to settle a case like this. But it should not be taken lightly. The lawsuit cites the company’s alleged lack of transparency in the water it sells.
